BGIP-1: Proposing the BeerGang DAO Structure and Process

[jck]

Category	Submitted by
Core	Planetarium Labs Pte. Ltd.

ABSTRACT

This document proposes the structure and governance process for BeerGang DAO, a decentralized autonomous organization governed by holders of BeerGang NFTs and $BOOZE, the native token of the BeerGang ecosystem. The DAO will serve as the primary decision-making body for the BeerGang community, fostering decentralized governance.

MOTIVATION

BeerGang DAO aims to revolutionize the Beer-inspired Characters IP community by leveraging blockchain technology and decentralized governance. By empowering BeerGang NFT and $BOOZE token holders, we seek to create a community-driven ecosystem that promotes innovation, quality, and accessibility.

The BeerGang DAO will enable community members to:

1. Submit and vote on proposals affecting the ecosystem
2. Allocate resources for development, marketing, and community initiatives
3. Shape the future of decentralized brewing and distribution

RATIONALE

BeerGang DAO will serve as the cornerstone of our decentralized BeerGang IP ecosystem, aligning the interests of BeerGang holders. By implementing a transparent and inclusive governance model, we aim to create a global community of BeerGang.

The core values of BeerGang DAO are:

1. Community: Fostering a global network of BeerGang.
2. Transparency: Ensuring open and honest communication in all DAO operations.
3. Sustainability: Build organic IP value by supporting BeerGang IP product and content.

BeerGang DAO represents version 2 (v2) of the BeerGang project, marking a significant evolution from its predecessor. This transition signifies a shift towards a more decentralized and community-driven model from a company-driven model. It is agreed upon that:

1. BeerGang DAO (v2) is the official continuation/reboot of the BeerGang project (v1).
2. All operations, assets, and responsibilities of v1 will be considered concluded upon the completion of the migration process to v2.
3. Any initiatives, projects, or plans that were part of v1 but not explicitly included in the v2 structure will be considered terminated.
4. Should the community wish to reintroduce or continue any aspect of v1 within the new DAO structure, a separate BGIP must be submitted and approved through the standard governance process for clarity and transparency.

This agreement ensures a clean transition to the new DAO structure while providing a mechanism for preserving valuable elements from the original project if the community deems them necessary.

GUIDELINES

1. DAO Membership: Holding BeerGang NFTs and $BOOZE tokens grants membership in the BeerGang DAO.

2. Proposal Categories:
   a. Core: Fundamental changes to the DAO structure or token economics
   b. Brewing: New product suggestion based on BeerGang IP ecosystem
   c. Distribution: Improvements to the marketplace for BeerGang NFTs & $BOOZE
   d. Community: Events, marketing initiatives, and partnerships
   e. Treasury: Allocation of DAO funds
   f. Process: Changes to governance procedures

3. Voting Power: One $BOOZE token equals one vote. People holding BeerGang NFT will get more voting power based on additional consensus from BeerGang DAO.
   a. Before minting of $BOOZE, One BeerGang NFT equals one vote.

4. Quorum Requirement: A minimum of 25% of circulating $BOOZE must participate for a vote to be valid.

5. Passing Threshold: A simple majority (>50%) is required for most proposals, with a 67% supermajority for Core and Treasury proposals.

6. Proposal Cooling Period: A 7-day period between proposal submission and voting to allow for community discussion.

7. Voting Duration: All votes will last for 7 days.

8. Implementation Time: Successful proposals must be implemented within 30 days unless otherwise specified in the proposal.

9. Writing and Language:
   a. All BeerGang DAO communication/BGIPs must be written in clear, concise English as the canonical language.
   b. BGIPs should follow a standardized format, including sections for Abstract, Motivation, Rationale, Specifications, Implementation, Timeline, and Costs.
   c. Technical terms should be clearly defined within the proposal.
   d. Proposals must be self-contained, including all necessary information for voters to make an informed decision.
   e. After the canonical English version is approved, community members are encouraged to provide translations in other languages to promote global participation. These translations should be clearly marked as unofficial and include a link to the original English version.
   f. In case of any discrepancies between the English version and translations, the English version will be considered authoritative.

10. Proposal Resubmission:
    a. Failed proposals may be resubmitted after a 30-day cooling-off period.
    b. Resubmissions must address the reasons for the initial failure and clearly outline the changes made.

KEY TERMS

• BGIP (BeerGang Improvement Proposal): A formal proposal submitted to the DAO for consideration.
• $BOOZE: The native governance token of the BeerGang ecosystem.
• Quorum: The minimum number of votes required for a proposal to be considered valid. Supermajority: A 67% or greater majority required for certain high-impact proposals.

THE PROCESS

1. Idea Submission:

• Community members submit ideas on the BeerGang forum for initial discussion.
• Ideas remain open for feedback for 7 days.

2. BGIP Draft:

• After the feedback period, authors can submit a formal BGIP draft using the provided template.
• Moderators review the draft for completeness and compliance with guidelines.

3. Analysis and Review:

• A designated team conducts an impact analysis of the proposal.
• The analysis is published alongside the BGIP for community review.

4. Voting:

• Eligible BGIPs are posted on the voting platform.
• $BOOZE holders can cast their votes during the 5-day voting period.

5. Implementation:

• Passed proposals are implemented by the relevant teams or community members.
• Regular updates on implementation progress are provided to the community.

SPECIFICATIONS

1. Governance Platform: Custom-built solution integrating forum discussions and on-chain voting
2. Token Standard: KIP-7 on Kaia mainnet
3. Voting Mechanism: Snapshot for gasless voting, before Snapshot launch, the mechanism will make a consensus on Gang House Forum.
4. Treasury Management: Multi-signature wallet controlled by elected community members

STEPS TO IMPLEMENT

1. Deploy $BOOZE token contract
2. Develop and launch the governance platform
3. Establish initial moderator team and analysis group
4. Create educational content for community members on DAO participation
5. Conduct a trial governance period with non-binding votes
6. Launch full DAO operations with binding votes

TIMELINE

• Month 1: Complete platform development and testing
• Month 2: Conduct trial governance period 1
  • This will be based on Planetarium Labs Snapshot / BeerGang ERC-721 NFT
• Month 3: Deploy $BOOZE token and begin platform development
• Month 4: Conduct trial governance period 2 (based on $BOOZE)
• Month 4: Launch full DAO operations

OVERALL COST

• Initial costs are paid by Kaia Migration Grant
• Monthly operational costs: 15,000 USD
  • Platform maintenance and upgrades: $4,000
  • Community management and moderation: $3,000
  • Ongoing legal and compliance: $2,000
  • Branding & IP moderation: $5,000
  • Miscellaneous expenses: $1,000
  • This will be paid by $BOOZE token with 7-days TWAP

Note: All costs are estimates and subject to change based on market conditions and specific requirements during implementation.

[jck]

Hi all, as CEO of Planetarium, I’m so happy to propose a #1 proposal of BeerGang DAO. This guide includes about how to operate governance by community based on ideas from the other leading DAO’s #1 proposals.

Feel free to leave any ideas regarding #1 proposal. About $BOOZE token mentioned in this proposal, we’ll upload separate #2 proposal for describing what it is and its detailed tokenomics design.

[stevevitabin]

I’m curious about the detailed basis for the expected cost. 예상비용에 대한 상세 근거가 좀 궁금한데 알 수 있나요?

[jck]

Stevevitabin, that’s a great question and I’ll explain more detailed information about this.

The estimated monthly operational costs for BeerGang DAO, totaling $15,000, represent a minimum viable budget designed to prioritize community value and sustainability. This lean approach becomes particularly notable when compared to other DAOs in the space, such as ApeDAO, which reportedly allocates around $50,000 per month for similar operations.

Here’s how BeerGang DAO plans to operate efficiently within this conservative budget:

1. Platform maintenance and upgrades ($4,000):

• $1,000 for server costs, $3,000 for development and improvements.
• This tight budget is manageable due to Planetarium’s existing technical expertise.

2. Community management and moderation ($3,000):

• Covers multi language supported, web3 professional one full-time equivalent (FTE) manager position.
• Achievable through Planetarium’s multifunctional resource pool.

3. Ongoing legal and compliance ($2,000):

• Crucial for navigating the complex, evolving Web3 regulatory landscape.
• Planetarium’s existing law firm relationships and buying power allow for more comprehensive legal support than the budget would typically afford.

4. Branding & IP moderation ($5,000):

• Primarily for GoodGang Labs’ FTE cost managing the BeerGang IP.
• This role will be responsible for the moderation and specific oversight of multiple resources required to protect and amplify the IP needed in the ecosystem.

5. Miscellaneous expenses ($1,000):

• Buffer for unexpected costs.

Key factors enabling this efficient operation include:

• Utilizing Planetarium’s multifunctional team and established Web3 expertise.
• Benefiting from existing infrastructure and industry relationships.
• Prioritizing essential functions while minimizing overhead.

DAO can adjust its cost structure or changing its operation team by voting another BGIP whenever DAO want. We believe this cost structure can available based on Planetarium’s existing infrastructure, future cost will be increased when we takeover its operation to another team.

–

Stevevitabin님, 질문 주셔서 감사합니다. 운영 예산에 대해 좀 더 자세히 설명해드리겠습니다.

총 15,000달러 규모의 비어갱 DAO의 월 운영 비용은 커뮤니티 가치와 지속 가능성을 우선시하기 위해 설계된 최소한의 실행 가능한 예산입니다. 이는 비슷한 운영을 위해 매달 약 5만 달러를 할당하고 있는 ApeDAO와 같은 다른 곳보다 훨씬 적습니다.

비어갱 DAO가 이렇게 보수적인 예산 내에서 효율적으로 운영할 수 있는 방법은 다음과 같습니다:

1. 플랫폼 유지보수 및 업그레이드($4,000):

• 서버 비용 1,000달러, 개발 및 개선 비용 3,000달러
• 서버 관리 및 웹3 엔지니어 1인의 급여 및 제경비를 포함합니다.
• 이 빠듯한 예산은 플라네타리움 랩스의 기존 기술 전문성 인프라 덕분에 관리할 수 있습니다.

2. 커뮤니티 관리 및 중재($3,000):

• 웹3 전문성 있는 다국어 지원 커뮤니티 담당자 1인의 급여 및 제경비를 포함합니다.
• 플라네타리움 랩스의 다기능 리소스 풀을 통해 달성 가능합니다.

3. 지속적인 법률 및 규정 준수($2,000):

• 복잡하고 진화하는 Web3 규제 환경을 점검하는 데 필수적입니다.
• 플라네타리움 랩스의 기존 로펌 관계와 구매력을 통해 일반적인 예산으로 감당할 수 있는 것보다 더 포괄적인 법률 지원을 받을 수 있습니다.

4. 브랜딩 및 IP 관리($5,000):

• 주로 BeerGang IP를 관리하는 굳갱랩스의 임직원 급여에 사용됩니다.
• 생태계에서 필요한 IP 보호 및 확대, 활용시 필요한 여러 리소스 모더레이션 및 구체적인 감수를 맡게 됩니다.

5. 기타 비용 ($1,000):

• 예상치 못한 비용에 대한 버퍼.

이러한 효율적인 운영을 가능하게 하는 핵심 요소는 다음과 같습니다:

• 플라네타리움 랩스의 다기능 팀과 확립된 웹3.0 전문성 활용.
• 기존 인프라 및 업계 관계의 이점.
• 오버헤드를 최소화하면서 필수 기능에 우선순위를 두었습니다.

DAO는 언제든지 다른 BGIP를 투표하여 비용 구조를 조정하거나 운영 팀을 변경할 수 있습니다. 현재 제안의 비용 구조는 플라네타리움의 기존 인프라를 기반으로 유지할 수 있으나, 향후 다른 팀에게 같은 수준의 운영을 요구한다면 비용이 증가할 것으로 예상됩니다.

[stevevitabin]

Yes, thank you for your answer. I have additional questions about DAO.

1. Will the DAO community (Discord) be operated separately? Or will it be operated in the form of agendas being raised and answered?

2. I understand that the BeerGang DAO Fund Planetarium x Superwork x GoodGang Labs was established together. What role does Superwork play?

3. I was informed that the Booz token is a community token, but is it only used for BeerGang DAO’s decision-making?

4. How does the DAO Fund model its revenue? Does it receive agendas and conduct its own business or invest in other projects to receive revenue from them?

5. From a business perspective, if the initial migration support fund is not used for operating expenses (if I invest with my own capital without doing that), how attractive is the investment?

6. What are the risks of the DAO Fund? (If the funding is inactive and the investment project does not generate profits, the operating expenses will continue to be consumed… If this continues, will the Dao Fund be closed and the Beer Gang IP be deleted?

7. Will the Beer Gang NFT be just a drawing after the Dao Fund is launched and the Booz token is issued? I wonder what functions and benefits will be maintained.

8. While planning the Dao Fund, there must have been businesses conceived in the early stages or projects that they want to fund. Are there any places where such plans and some level of groundwork have been done?

네 답변 감사합니다. 다오 관련 추가 질문이 있습니다.

1. 다오 커뮤니티(디스코드)가 따로 운영 예정인가요? 아니면 이렇게 안건이 올라오고 이에 답변하는 형태의 운영 일까요?

2. 비어갱 다오 펀드 플라네타리움 x 슈퍼워크 x 굳갱랩스 이렇게 함께 설립한 것으로 알고 있는데, 슈퍼워크는 어떤 역할을 하나요?

3. 부즈 토큰은 커뮤니티 토큰이라고 안내를 받았는데 이는 비어갱 다오의 의사결정에만 쓰이는 건가요?

4. 다오펀드는 어떻게 수익 모델을 그리고 있나요? 안건을 받아서 자체적으로 사업을 진행해 보거나 또는 다른 프로젝트에 투자함으로써 거기서 오는 수익을 배분 받는 건가요?

5. 사업적인 관점에서 보았을때, 마이그레이션 초기지원금이 운영비용으로 쓰이지 않는다면 ( 그런 것 없이 나의 자본으로 투자를 한다면 ) 투자 매력도는 어느 정도 일까요?

6. 다오펀드의 리스크는 어떤 것들이 있을까요? (펀딩 비활성화 및 투자 프로젝트에 수익이 나지 않을 경우 운영비는 계속 소진되며… 계속 이렇게 진행되면 다오펀드 closing 및 비어갱 IP 소멸 인가요?

7. 비어갱 NFT는 다오펀드가 출범하고 부즈토큰이 발행되고 나면 그냥 그림에 해당하나요? 어떠한 기능 및 benefit이 유지가 될지 궁금합니다.

8. 다오펀드를 계획하면서 초기에 구상해 놓은 사업 또는 펀딩하고자 하는 프로젝트들도 있을 것 같기도 한데, 그러한 계획 및 어느 정도 물밑 작업이 된 곳도 있나요?

[jck]

Stevevitabin, please leave the question using english as a main language than I’ll leave the answer for it today! It looks like you also ask about Funds and $BOOZE token too but it would be uploaded separate proposal.

Stevevitabin 님, 영어 질문을 같이 올려주시면 그에 맞춰 답변을 오늘중 남기도록 하겠습니다. 미리 보건데 현재 질문에서는 펀드와 부즈 토큰에 대해서 주로 다루고 있는 것으로 보이는데요. 이 두 건에 대해서는 현재 1번 제안에서 다루고 있지는 않아, 별도의 프로포절이 올라온 후 질의해주시면 될 것 같습니다.

[stevevitabin]

네 영문도 추가로 남겼습니다. 질문중 관련 있는 내용만 답변주시면 좋겠습니다. 문서로만 있는 내용을 문서만 보고서 완벽히 이해는 좀 어렵네요. 다오 프로젝트 자체가 신규프로젝트라면 대략 읽어보고 yes or no를 선택하면 간단한 문제인데. 비어갱의 경우 2차 민팅 및 브루잉 까지 종료된 상황에서. 굳갱랩스에서 민팅 및 브루잉시 홀더들에게 약속했던 방향과는 별도로 다오체제가 나와서 홀더들은 아직 방향성을 못잡고 있습니다. 오늘 ama 통해서 얼마나 상세 설명이 이루어 질지 모르겠지만, 지속적으로 다오체제로서의 가능성 및 밝은 청사진 등 많이 설명해 주시면 좋을 듯합니다. 빠른 응대 일단 감사드립니다.

[jck]

1. Will the DAO community (Discord) be operated separately? Or will it be operated in the form of agendas being raised and answered?

Discord will operate as same as before, but it would be more casual & general purpose of DAO communication. Forum is more for BGIP suggestion and discussion because we want to archive all communication behind major DAO decision more accessible.

디스코드는 이전과 동일하게 운영될 것이지만, 보다 캐주얼하고 일반적인 목적의 DAO 커뮤니케이션이 될 것입니다. 포럼은 BGIP 제안과 토론에 더 중점을 두어, 주요 DAO 의사 결정에 대한 모든 커뮤니케이션을 더 쉽게 접근할 수 있도록 남기고자 합니다.

3. I understand that the BeerGang DAO Fund Planetarium x SuperWalk x GoodGang Labs was established together. What role does SuperWalk play?

SuperWalk also participated as a LP of fund, and they will take a role of advisor for each portfolio founders. We’ll explain more about this on upcoming Fund Whitepaper.

슈퍼워크는 또한 우리가 조성할 펀드의 LP로 참여하고, 창업자 인큐베이팅 과정의 일부분을 담당합니다. 이에 대한 자세한 내용은 향후 펀드 백서에서 설명할 예정입니다.

4. I was informed that the Booze token is a community token, but is it only used for BeerGang DAO’s decision-making?

$BOOZE token is a 100% community token backed by BeerGang’s upcoming fund revenue. Moreover, based on voting, $BOOZE will fund lots of potentially great project. We’ll explain more about this on upcoming proposal (BGIP-2)

부즈 토큰은 비어갱의 향후 펀드 수익으로 지원되는 100% 커뮤니티 토큰입니다. 또한, 투표를 통해 $BOOZE는 잠재적으로 훌륭한 프로젝트에 자금을 지원할 것입니다. 이에 대한 자세한 내용은 곧 발표될 제안서(BGIP-2)에서 설명해드리겠습니다.

5. How does the DAO Fund model its revenue? Does it receive agendas and conduct its own business or invest in other projects to receive revenue from them?

Fund itself doesn’t do direct business using the money. It will generate revenue by investing other early stage projects that has great potential to make alpha. We’ll explain more about this on upcoming Fund Whitepaper.

펀드 자체는 이 자금으로 직접 사업을 하지 않습니다. 수익을 창출할 가능성이 큰 다른 초기 단계 프로젝트에 투자하여 수익을 창출할 것입니다. 이에 대한 자세한 내용은 다음 펀드 백서에서 설명해드리겠습니다.

6. From a business perspective, if the initial migration support fund is not used for operating expenses (if I invest with my own capital without doing that), how attractive is the investment?

Most of Kaia Migration Grant except initial founding cost will be allocated to upcoming fund.

초기 창업 비용을 제외한 카이아 마이그레이션 지원금의 대부분은 향후 조성될 펀드에 할당될 예정입니다.

7. What are the risks of the DAO Fund? (If the funding is inactive and the investment project does not generate profits, the operating expenses will continue to be consumed… If this continues, will the Dao Fund be closed and the Beer Gang IP be deleted?

DAO Fund is a kind of a general web3 venture venture fund so that it has a risk profile that most of venture fund typically have. We’ll explain more about this on upcoming Fund Whitepaper.

비어갱 DAO의 펀드는일반적인 웹3 벤처 펀드의 일종으로, 대부분의 벤처 펀드가 일반적으로 가지고 있는 위험 프로필을 가지고 있습니다. 이에 대한 자세한 내용은 다음 펀드 백서에서 설명해드리겠습니다.

9. Will the Beer Gang NFT be just a drawing after the Dao Fund is launched and the Booz token is issued? I wonder what functions and benefits will be maintained.

BeerGang NFT will stand as a same position. Moreover, we’ll give additional voting right for NFT holders.

비어갱 NFT는 동일한 포지션으로 유지됩니다. 또한, NFT 보유자에게는 추가 투표권을 부여할 예정입니다.

10. While planning the Dao Fund, there must have been businesses conceived in the early stages or projects that they want to fund. Are there any places where such plans and some level of groundwork have been done?

We already have several good potential projects to invest using this fund since we already have funds and deal pipeline for it.

이미 자금과 거래 파이프라인을 확보하고 있기 때문에 이 펀드를 활용해 투자할 수 있는 좋은 잠재 프로젝트 라인업이 있습니다.

[stevevitabin]

"BeerGang DAO (v2) is the official continuation/reboot of the BeerGang project (v1).
All operations, assets, and responsibilities of v1 will be considered concluded upon the completion of the migration process to v2.

BeerGang DAO(v2)는 BeerGang 프로젝트(v1)의 공식적인 연속/재부팅입니다.
v1의 모든 운영, 자산 및 책임은 v2로의 마이그레이션 프로세스가 완료되면 종료된 것으로 간주됩니다."

→ 해당 제안에 대한 의견 드립니다. Beergang V2는 Beergang V1이 있기에 가능한 것으로 생각합니다. Beergang V1 시절 홀더는 주주다. 신족의 경우 최고 대우를 해줄 것이다. 팀에서 약속한 부분들이 있습니다. 비어갱 DAO 체제로 전환하더라도 과거의 자산 및 책임에 대한 부분이 종료가
아닌 승계 또는 이전이 되어야할 것 같습니다. 비어갱 IP의 권한이 굳갱랩스 → 다오체제로 위임 하는 행태라면 운영 자산 및 책임
등이 이전 및 승계 되어야 한다고 생각합니다.

I think Beergang V2 is possible because of Beergang V1. Holders of Beergang V1 are shareholders. In the case of the Genesis beergang NFT, the best benefits will be given. There are parts that the team promised. Even if it switches to the Beergang DAO system, it seems that the past assets and responsibilities should be transferred or inherited, not terminated. If the authority of Beergang IP is delegated from Goodgang Labs → DAO system, I think the operating assets and responsibilities should be transferred and inherited.

[jck]

For operations, it is already clear that v2 is the official continuation, as it has been declared to be the proposal.

As for assets, the nature of BGIP makes it impossible to be comprehensive. BGIP cannot force any specific company to work for DAO, or force them to take any specific company’s assets.

However, GG Labs are open to discussing specific assets that you would like to migrate, and we can add them to BGIP-1, or build them into additional BGIPs.

운영에 대해서는, v2가 official continuation 임을 선언했으므로 승계가 되는 것을 이미 명시하고 있습니다.

자산에 대해서는, BGIP의 특성상 이를 포괄적으로 간주하는 것은 불가능합니다. BGIP는 어떤 특정 회사를 강제로 일하게 하거나, 특정 회사의 자산을 강제로 가져오도록 할 수 없습니다.

다만, 굳갱랩스와 구체적으로 어떤 자산이 승계되길 바라는지 논의하면 이를 BGIP-1에 더하거나, 추가 BGIP로 승계를 진행하는데 있어 굳갱랩스가 열려있습니다.

[loun]

@jck

3. Analysis and Review:

• A designated team conducts an impact analysis of the proposal.
• The analysis is published alongside the BGIP for community review.

This step could be very costly - if we made it mandatory, the DAO would have to pay the analysis team for every proposal. It would also delay the proposals from moving forward until the analysis was done. So I suggest that we remove this step.

[jck]

I agreed with that. will adjust when I upload final version of proposal on voting phase.

[nope]

[BGIP-1 Voting]

Voting: https://forms.gle/Nsnxjei8EuKDHRSy8
Period : 2024.09.25. ~ 2024.10.02. 09:00 (KST)

• Voting power will be recognized as 1 BeerGang NFT = 1 vote (this may change once the relevant BGIP is officially passed).
• Voting power will be calculated based on the BeerGang NFT Snapshot taken at the time of voting closure.
• Submission of the Event ID and a screenshot is required for voting power measurement. (*Failure to submit or submission of incorrect information may result in vote invalidation.)
• The final results will be announced on October 2, 2024, at 18:00 (KST).
  __
• Voting Power는 1 BeerGang NFT = 1 투표권 으로 인정됩니다. (이는 관련 BGIP가 공식적으로 통과될 시 변동될 수 있습니다.)
• Voting Power는 투표 종료 시점의 BeerGang NFT Snapshot을 기준으로 산정됩니다.
• Voting Power 측정을 위해 Event ID와 캡쳐 이미지 제출은 필수입니다. (제출하지 않거나 제출된 정보에 오류가 있을 경우, 해당 투표는 무효 처리될 수 있습니다.)
• 최종 결과는 2024.10.02 18:00 (KST)에 발표될 예정입니다.

[stevevitabin]

@jck

Community management and moderation: $3,000

Are you running a new community separately? Holders want real-time, immediate communication. You can ask and receive questions and answers through BGIP, but it is a bit passive. I am curious about the direction of the Beerganga Dao community. Will you go with written questions and answers through the Beerganga forum? My concern is that if real-time communication is weak, the power of Dao and community members will be weak. If you go to a restaurant and no one welcomes you, you will not want to come back.

신규 커뮤니티를 따로 운영하나요? 홀더들은 실시간 즉각적인 소통을 원합니다. BGIP를 통해서 질의 및 응답을 받을 수 있지만 약간 수동적인 방식입니다. 비어갱 다오 커뮤니티 운영 방향이 궁금합니다. BEERGANG 포럼을 통해서 서면 질의 및 응답 형태로 갈 것인지요? 우려되는 것은 실시간 소통이 약해지면 다오 및 커뮤 구성원 파워는 약해집니다. 레스토랑에 갔는데 손님을 아무도 반겨주지 않는 곳이라면 다시 오고 싶지 않을 것입니다.

[forum_ops]

[GangHouse Forum | BGIP-1 Voting Results] BGIP-1 has been approved with 99.2% support and a 51.22% voter turnout Voting Participation Rate: 51.22% (3,414 of 6,666 BeerGang NFT ) Voting Results

• Agree : 99.82%
• Disagree : 0.00%
• Abstain : 0.18%

BGIP-1 Voting Results: https://url.kr/ykth8s BGIP-1: BGIP-1: Proposing the BeerGang DAO Structure and Process Voting Period : 2024.09.25. ~ 2024.10.02. 09:00 (KST)

• The voting participation data is based on valid votes, excluding invalid votes such as incorrect Event ID image submissions.
• Voting power is calculated based on the BeerGang NFT Snapshot taken at the time of voting closure. (October 2, 2024, 09:00 KST).
• Voting power is recognized as 1 BeerGang NFT = 1 vote (this may change once the relevant BGIP is officially passed).